The Feast of the Holy Name of Jesus, January 3, 2016

The Most Holy Name of Jesus
Evening, 2 January 2016
Church of St John / Agawam
 
And let every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus Christ
is in the glory of God the Father (Phil 2:11).
 
When we survey the main differences between the two forms of the one Roman Rite—the forma extraordinaria and the forma ordinaria—we observe that there are basically two: a difference in the texts and rubrics on the one hand, and a difference in the liturgical calendar on the other. We leave the differences of texts and rubrics aside for now. However, when it comes to the two calendars, the differences are the starkest during the time of year in which we now are.
 
A very detailed exploration of these differences is not possible now; and besides, this is not a lecture. But for instance, today is the feast of the Holy Name of Jesus; in the Ordinary Form, it is the feast of the Epiphany. In the Extraordinary Form, Epiphany falls on the 6th of January, twelve days after Christmas. The feast of the Holy Family, which was celebrated last Sunday in the Ordinary Form, falls next Sunday in the Extraordinary Form. As for the feast of the Lord’s Baptism, the Ordinary Form will celebrate it on Sunday, January 10th; the Extraordinary Form on Wednesday, January 13th. It is also worth noting that little season of Epiphanytide was entirely eliminated from the Ordinary Form.  
 
But all of that is much more detail than you might have wanted. So, stepping back for a moment from the differences, we might ask a more basic question: what exactly is the Liturgical Year? Regardless of which form of the Rite we use, what is this thing that we keep track of and celebrate year in and year out? I think we likely take it for granted, and in a certain sense we should. And yet sometimes we focus (again rightfully) on the mysteries we celebrate, without ever thinking about the whole picture. We miss the forest for the trees. For a moment, then, let us reflect on the meaning and purpose of the whole Liturgical Year.
 
“At the outset we must grasp one thing: the liturgy is primarily concerned with the present. The past and the future are only symbols or signposts of today’s outpouring of grace. The chief function of the liturgy is to bring us divine life now.”[1] The first thing to note is that the Liturgical Year is not about reenacting; it is not about trying to put on some kind of extended pageant. Nor is our liturgy about nostalgia; it has everything to do with our daily life, here and now, in 2016.  
 
And furthermore—and this is a crucial point—our yearly liturgical celebration is not about self-expression or community building. We do not keep the Liturgical Year simply to remind ourselves or to show others that we are Catholic or that we are a church. Quite the contrary. Rather, when our divine Savior came among us, everything he did was winning grace for us; even the simplest of his acts was opening up the way of friendship to God. Now, Christ did many things; he taught with many teachings—and these leave us changed and made holy, here in the present moment. So we need the Liturgical Year to unpack, as it were, the mysteries and the grace that he won for us, and then to carry them into the present for us to receive and enjoy.    
 
If that all that is true, then our approach to the Liturgical Year is twofold: we must first understand what we are celebrating, and then apply it.[2] The Liturgical Year teaches us who Christ is; and that takes a lifetime for us to learn. But by gradually getting to know him, we love him. (I have said all that before; probably I will say it a thousand more times.) We also love him by gradually following his commandments with greater perfection. Thus, the Liturgical Year is the means by which this process of knowing and loving is brought about in our souls. Year after year, if we live close to our liturgical celebrations, we are meant to know Christ more clearly and to love him greater devotion.     
 
That brings us rather neatly to today’s feast, the Most Holy Name of Jesus. The round of the Liturgical Year is one grand exposition of how the Lord “is in the glory of God the Father,” as St Paul writes. The cycle of mysteries is given to us as an extended proof of the glory of the Name of Christ. It is all about him, our Jesus, and all those mysteries connected with him—especially those of his Immaculate Mother. During one season we focus on his coming among us as man; then we emphasize his being revealed to the nations and his teaching; then we gather around the mystery of his Passion; and then the glory of his Resurrection and Ascension. In a sense, the whole Liturgical Year is a great proclamation of the Holy Name of Jesus.
 
Each Mass, too, is an act of reverence to the Holy Name. We regard the name of Jesus as so holy, in fact, that the rubrics force the priest to bow his head toward the crucifix each time he utters it. 
 
But then what spiritual lesson are we left with? This magnificent sovereignty of Christ, which the Liturgical Year proclaims, is the stay and support of all our days. Salvation history, and our liturgical commemorations that draws us into that history, are the foundation of our personal history. The grace of God, which is constantly given to us through the Liturgical Year, is here for our strength and consolation. This means that no matter what 2016 brings for us and for our world, we stand on the surest foundation—the Holy Name of Jesus. With his name on our lips and in our hearts, nothing can assail us. 
 
On the night when he was betrayed, the Lord Jesus gathered his Apostles, the first priests, around himself and around that first Eucharistic table. Among many other things, he spoke these words to them, but also to us: “And yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me. I have said this to you, so that in me you may find peace. In the world, you will only find tribulation; but take courage, I have overcome the world.”[3]



[1] Pius Parsch, The Church’s Year of Grace, vol 1, (The Liturgical Press, Collegeville MN: 1959), p 5.  
[2] Cf ibid, p 3.  
[3] Jn 16:32-33, Knox trans.

1 comment: